Refine your search
Collections
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Gupta, Himanshu
- Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Edentulous Segmental Mandibulectomy Patient: a Case Report
Abstract Views :277 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Dept. of Prosthodontics, Sardar Patel Post Graduate Institute of Dental and Medical Sciences, Rai Baraeli Road, Lucknow, IN
2 Dept. of Prosthodontics, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, IN
3 Dept. of Prosthodontics, A. B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, IN
4 Dept. of Prosthodontics, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, IN
1 Dept. of Prosthodontics, Sardar Patel Post Graduate Institute of Dental and Medical Sciences, Rai Baraeli Road, Lucknow, IN
2 Dept. of Prosthodontics, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, IN
3 Dept. of Prosthodontics, A. B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, IN
4 Dept. of Prosthodontics, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, Vol 4, No 1 (2013), Pagination: 110-113Abstract
An understanding of postsurgical anatomy and physiology is an obvious prerequisite to the development of new prosthetic procedures for mandibulectomy patients. Loss of the potential basal seat area, atrophic and fragile oral mucosa, reduction in salivary output, angular pathway of mandibular closure, deviation of the mandible and impairment of the motor and sensory control of the tongue, lips and cheeks makes the fabrication of a prosthesis difficult in these situations. Several prosthetic options include sectional prosthesis, use of palatal ramp, setting double rows of teeth on the unresected side in maxilla and use of functional chew in technique. This article describes the use of two rows of maxillary posterior teeth on the unresected side in a patient who had undergone segmental mandibulectomy. The inner row helped in restoring the function whereas the outer row helped in restoring the cheek support and esthetics.Keywords
Mandibulectomy, Double Rows of Teeth
References
- Cantor R, Curtis TA. Prosthetic management of edentulous mandibulectomy patients. Part 1. Anatomic, physiologic and psychologic consideration. J Prosthet Dent 1971;25: 446-457.
- Scaaf NG. Oral construction for edentulous patients after partial mandibulectomies. J Prosthet Dent 1976; 36:292-297.
- Beumer J, Curtis T, Firtell D editors. Maxillofacial rehabilitation. St. Louis: Mosby; 1979. p. 90-169.
- Swoope CC. Prosthetic management of resected edentulous mandible. J Prosthet Dent 1969;21: 197-202
- Rosenthal LC. The edentulous patient with jaw defects. Dent Clin North Am 964; 8:773-779.
- Cantor R, Curtis TA. Prosthetic management of edentulous mandibulectomy patients: Part II, Clinical procedures. J Prosthet Dent 1971; 25: 546-555.
- Curtis TA, Cantor R.The forgotten patient in maxillofacial prosthetics. J Prosthet Dent 1974; 31: 662-679.
- Desjardins RP. Occlusal considerations for the partial mandibulectomy patient. J Prosthet Dent 1979; 41:308-315.
- Diagnostic Imaging in Implantology: from Conventional to Newer Paradigms
Abstract Views :261 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Dept. of Prosthodontics, Sardar Patel Post Graduate Institute of Dental And Medical Sciences, Rai Baraeli Road, Lucknow, IN
2 Dept. of Prosthodontics, Sardar Patel Post Graduate Institute of Dental And Medical Sciences, Rai Baraeli Road, Lucknow, IN
3 Dept. of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Csmu (Former King George Medical College), Lucknow, IN
1 Dept. of Prosthodontics, Sardar Patel Post Graduate Institute of Dental And Medical Sciences, Rai Baraeli Road, Lucknow, IN
2 Dept. of Prosthodontics, Sardar Patel Post Graduate Institute of Dental And Medical Sciences, Rai Baraeli Road, Lucknow, IN
3 Dept. of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Csmu (Former King George Medical College), Lucknow, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, Vol 3, No 2 (2012), Pagination: 58-62Abstract
Imaging is an useful adjunct for many dental procedures in general but is essential in the clinical practice of implantology. Apart from ruling out local bone and tooth pathology, imaging helps clinicians to determine bone quality and quantity and give a fair idea of implant orientation. Unlike endodontics, which can rely on conventional intra oral periapical assays (IOPA), imaging in implantology require definite cross sectional views to appreciate buccal and lingual bone plates and overall bone quality and quantity bucco-lingually. From conventional IOPAs and orthopantomograms (OPG) to cone beamcomputed tomography (CBCT) and three dimensional implant planning software with computer aided designined and machinined surgical guide templates, the diagnostics in implantology has gone through a sea change. With prosthetically guided implant placement becoming a standard protocol today, the need for computed tomography has also increased. This article reviews various diagnostic imaging modalities used in implantology today with clinical guidelines to adhere in the end.Keywords
Imaging, IOPA, OPG, CBCT, Three Dimensional Implant Planning SoftwareReferences
- Carl E Misch. Dental Implants Prosthetics.2004 Mosby publishers.
- Stephen L. Wheeler. Implant Complications in the Esthetic Zone, J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007,65-93-102.
- Moy and Aghaloo. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2007;22 Suppl49-70.
- Rita Mason and Bourne. A Guide to Dental Radiographs, Oxford University Press, 1998
- Rosenfeld Mecall,Nevinis and Melloning, Implant therapy: clinical approaches and evidence of success, Vol 2, Quintessence publishers 1998.
- Singh A, Shekhar A, Singh SK: Diagnostic Dental Imaging and Implant Prosthodontics. Indian Dentist Research and ReviewJan2010, 97-103
- Morner-SvallingA-C, Tronje G, Andeson LG, Welander U. Comparison of the diagnostic potential of direct digital and conventional intraoral radiographyin the evaluation of peri implant conditions. Clin Oral Impl Res,14,2003;714-719.
- Schliephake H,Wichmann M, Donnerstag F, Vogt S,. Imaging of periimplant bone levels of implants with buccal bone defects. Clin Oral Impl Res,14,2003;193-200.
- Verhoeven JW, Ruijter J, Cune MS, Terlou M. Oblique lateral cephalometric radigraphs of the mandible in implantology: usefulness and reproducibility of the technique in quantitative densitometric measurements of the mandible in vivo Clin Oral Impl Res,11, 2000, 476-486.
- Frei C, Buser D, Dula K. Study on the necessity for cross sectional imaging of the posterior mandible for treatment planning of standard cases in implant dentistry. Clin Oral Impl Res,15, 2004;490-497.
- Vazquezv L, SaulaicN, Belser U, Bernard J-P. Efficacy of panoramic radiographs in the preoperative planningof posterior mandibular implants:a prospective clinical study of 1527 consequitively treated patients. Clin Oral Impl Res, 19,2008;81-85.
- Stramotas S, Geenty JP, Darendeliler MA, Byloff F, Berger J , Petocz P. The reliability of crown ischolar_main ratio, linear and angular measurementson panoramic radiographs. Clin Orthod Res. 3 2000;182-191.
- Diniz AF et al. Changes in pre surgical treatment planning using conventional spiral tomography Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Mar;19(3):249-53
- Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P, Clinical applications of cone beam computed tomography in dental practice J Can Dent Assoc 2006; 72(1):75–80.